Re: GrlMediaType GrlTypeFilter redundancy

["Juan A. Suarez Romero" <jasuarez igalia com>]

On Fri, 2013-05-10 at 12:16 +0200, Roland Peffer wrote:
> I just noticed that GrlMediaType and GrlTypeFilter have the same functionality.
> Is there any sense for that or would it not be better to have only one type.

I think it was done to avoid breaking the API.

Point is that GrlMediaType was added later, because using GrlTypeFilter
instead was a bit weird; not weird because of the data type itself, but
because of the name: weird that getting supported media were returning a
filter :)

In any case, I hope that in a future breaking-API release we can merge
both of them in only one type.

        J.A.