Re: [PATCH 5/5] fake-metadata: updated to =?UTF-8?Q?may=5Fresolve?= =?UTF-8?Q?=28=29=20API?=
- From: Iago Toral <itoral igalia com>
- To: <grilo-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] fake-metadata: updated to may_resolve() API
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:35:57 +0000
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:55:17 +0100, "Juan A." Suárez Romero
<jasuarez igalia com> wrote:
On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 16:32 +0100, Guillaume Emont wrote:
src/fake-metadata/grl-fake-metadata.c | 41
1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
This is not a question for Guillaume, but for everybody.
Is it worth to keep fake-metadata in Grilo?
It was some time ago, when we needed a fake metadata source to do
But right now, I think it is not worth to keep it, and we should
For the matter of tests, actually we should have a fake metadata but
the unit tests, as a mockup.
I think a fake-metadata provider is interesting for testing things like
the full-resolution stuff that Guillaume was doing these days but it is
true that it should not live with the rest of the plugins any more, just
let's do what you say and move it to the tests.
] [Thread Prev