Re: sample files not all in the distribution
- From: Morten Welinder <mortenw gnome org>
- To: Pierre Labastie <pierre labastie neuf fr>
- Cc: Gnumeric Mailing List <gnumeric-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: sample files not all in the distribution
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:43:06 -0500
We only ship a few of the test files. This is for size reasons. We
basically just
need enough to tell if something is terribly wrong.
And then there's the valgrind section of tests. I can't make those
succeed on your
machine. The libraries we use -- glib, gtk+ for example -- have problems that
require the use of suppressions. Every different version needs its own set of
suppressions, so they will likely fail for a lot of people.
Morten
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Pierre Labastie
<pierre labastie neuf fr> wrote:
Hi,
I am new to this list. I am one of the "editors" of the BLFS
(http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/) book. It is a book
of "build recipes" for linux packages.
Usually, when a new version of package is released, we build
it, and we run the tests to check that we have not missed
something important. Lately, I have updated the "gnumeric
page" (versions 1.12.19 and 1.12.20) , and noticed that a lot
of tests were skipped: the reason is that not all the
sample files used for the tests are in the released tarball.
I cloned the git repository, and there are the missing sample
files. It looks like the reason why not all the files are included
is the code in Makefile.am:
--------
dist-hook:
mkdir $(distdir)/samples
cp $(srcdir)/samples/*.gnumeric $(distdir)/samples/.
mkdir $(distdir)/samples/excel
cp $(srcdir)/samples/excel/*.xls $(distdir)/samples/excel/.
-------
So my question is: is there a specific reason for not including
those sample files, at least those needed by the tests?
Regards
Pierre
_______________________________________________
gnumeric-list mailing list
gnumeric-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]