Re: Simulation Analysis in the User's guide - review needed

[Louis Luangkesorn <lluang yahoo com>]

I'll have updated docbook for analysis-simulation.xml and a diff file for gnumeric.xml in bugzilla by end of today.

  --Louis

> Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:11:44 +0200
> From: Adrian Custer <acuster gmail com>
> Subject: Re: Simulation Analysis in the User's guide - review needed
>
<snip>
> Making an arbitrary decision, let's move the docs to docbook 4.5 so you
> can define your pretty equations. We'll assume the rest of the world
> will catch up with us eventually.

> As for your entity references, it seems like they are already defined
> within or by an extension to the docbook system. If you can get it to
> work, we'll live with what you did for now. I agree that &Theta; is more
> readable that the unicode point.

> --adrian




------------------------------

_______________________________________________
gnumeric-list mailing list
gnumeric-list gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list


End of gnumeric-list Digest, Vol 52, Issue 15
*********************************************