Re: char (un)signedness

There shouldn't be any trouble with signedness.  We need to fix any
such issues.  (I am not at all worried over implicit signedness casts,

Jody, here's a good one...

applix-read.c:260: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type

        if (0 <= *val && *val <= '9')
                return *val - '0';

A few quotes could do wonders here, :-)


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]