Hi, > > In this case I think we should modify the existing search API. > > Currently search returns notes at random order (from users > > perspective). Changing it to a defined order should not hurt, so I > > think there's no need to introduce a new API. > > Being able to select an order with an argument would be even better. > But the change to the API is bigger with that. That applies only when an argument determines by what we are ordering (title, last change time, search matches count, ...). > Shouldn't this suggestion also get sent to Tomboy? I personally think > that having the same dbus API that behaves the same way as Tomboy's is > a positive thing. I fully support that. Especialy if we decide to add an argument to a function. In that case I think we should work together and make a shared decision. -- Aurimas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part