Re: new dbus api: SearchNotesSorted?



Hi,

> > In this case I think we should modify the existing search API.
> > Currently search returns notes at random order (from users
> > perspective). Changing it to a defined order should not hurt, so I
> > think there's no need to introduce a new API.
> 
> Being able to select an order with an argument would be even better.
> But the change to the API is bigger with that.

That applies only when an argument determines by what we are ordering
(title, last change time, search matches count, ...).


> Shouldn't this suggestion also get sent to Tomboy? I personally think
> that having the same dbus API that behaves the same way as Tomboy's is
> a positive thing.

I fully support that. Especialy if we decide to add an argument to a
function. In that case I think we should work together and make a shared
decision.

-- 
Aurimas

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]