Re: Need approve to committing

[Rahul Sundaram <metherid gmail com>]

On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Aurimas Černius <aurisc4 gmail com> wrote:

I see your point, but I don't think I agree with it.
The point is not to close bugzilla tickets, but to fix Gnote bugs. I don't see big difference between patch committed to different branch and patch submitted to bugzilla. I'd say the later is better, as bugzilla provides facilities for patch verification & approval.

Using different branch IMO is useful for long term work, such as adding synchronization support or migrating to GTK+ 3.0. BTW, I think there is sense in creating them. If I remember right, there is some initial code for the first one, and Bug 633215 can be used as start point for the later. What do you think?

Then commit to the main branch, fix the bugs and do a bug fix release.  I could build and push to Rawhide and get the release more exposure as well.   Full disclosure:  I am the Gnote maintainer in Fedora where Gnote is used by default and requested Debarishi to take over maintainership. 

Rahul