RE: [gnomemm] 2 small packaging issues with libbonobo*mm

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

Dude, please see "How do I create a patch":
http://www.gtkmm.org/bugs.shtml

Murray Cumming
murrayc usa net
www.murrayc.com 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Nedotsukov [mailto:bland mail ru] 
> Sent: Freitag, 23. Mai 2003 08:05
> To: Cumming Murray (COMNEON Linz)
> Cc: gnomemm-list gnome org
> Subject: Re: [gnomemm] 2 small packaging issues with libbonobo*mm
> 
> 
> Murray Cumming Comneon com wrote:
> 
> >>From: Alexander Nedotsukov [mailto:bland mail ru] 
> >>I made a set of packages of gnomemm C++ bindings for FreeBSD ports 
> >>collection.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >If there are definitive FreeBSD gtkmm and gnomemm binaries 
> then maybe you
> >could tell us how to mention them on the download page.
> >
> Sure. At the moment we have gtkmm series only. The simplest way to 
> install binary package is to run "pkg_add -r gtkmm" for gtkmm v1 or 
> "pkg_add -r gtk--2"  for gtkmm v2. I believe gtk--2 acronym will be 
> changed to gtkmm2 soon. It's also posible to build port itself via 
> regular /usr/ports tree facility. Gnomemm packages will be available 
> shortly after next system release. I will drop an announcement to the 
> mail-list then.
> 
> >>Second.
> >>http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/gnomemm/libbonobouimm/bonobo
mm/Makefile.am
>>Shouldn't 'libbonobouimm_includedir' be $(includedir)/libbonobomm-2.0 
>>    
>>
>instead of $(includedir)/libgnomemm-2.0?
>
>Yes, I think you are right.
>
Btw, I also found similar problem in tools/m4/Makefile.am

>>The abouve true for both libbonobomm and libbonobouimm modules.
>>    
>>
>
>OK, I look forward to the patch. Well done.
>
After all this seems to be final change request. See the files attched.

All the best,
Alexander.