Re: [gnomemm] GnomeVFSToplevelURI

[Bryan Forbes <mxpxfifws yahoo com>]

    I found something else:  should we re-#define GNOME_VFS_URI_PATH_CHR,
GNOME_VFS_URI_PATH_STR, and the likes (I think there are two others that aren't coming to
mind right now).  Just off the top of my head, we might be able to make them static
members of Gnome::Vfs::Uri.  Anyway, any thoughts on that would be appreciated as well.

-Bryan



--- Bryan Forbes <mxpxfifws yahoo com> wrote:
>     As I was going through documenting gnome-vfsmm, I came across the Uri::get_toplevel
> method which returns a GnomeVFSToplevelURI*.  I was wondering if we should wrap this
> struct.  If I'm reading the C source right, it's not refcounted, and I think this is
> the
> only method that uses this struct.  Just glancing thru the C API, I can't find any
> methods that work on this struct because (and this is just a guess) it inherits from
> GnomeVFSURI.  So, what should we do?
> 
> -Bryan
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
> http://search.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> gnomemm-list mailing list
> gnomemm-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemm-list


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com