Re: [gnomemm] binary-incompatible changes to gnomemm 1?

[murrayc t-online de (Murray Cumming)]

On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 16:56, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 17:15, ERDI Gergo wrote:
> > On 28 Jan 2003, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > 
> > > gnome-- hasn't built with my autotools for a while. Could you try to
> > > make a tarball for me? And while you're at it, you might make it depend
> > > on gnome-libs 1.4.1.6 which is the one that broke the procbar API.
> > 
> > 1.4.1.6? Now that's a weird version number :)
> > 
> > I've put a tarball up at http://cactus.rulez.org/files/ can you check it
> > please and then release it?
> 
> I had forgotten that configure checking was so difficult with 1.4. The
> error message seems to mention the wrong version here:
> http://cvs.gnome.org/bonsai/cvsview2.cgi?diff_mode=context&whitespace_mode=show&subdir=gnome--&command=DIFF_FRAMESET&file=configure.in&rev1=1.28&rev2=1.29&root=/cvs/gnome

And I don't see your fill() addition in the ChangeLog.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murray usa net
www.murrayc.com