Re: [gnomemm] binary-incompatible changes to gnomemm 1?
- From: ERDI Gergo <cactus cactus rulez org>
- To: murrayc usa net
- Cc: GNOMEmm mailing list <gnomemm-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [gnomemm] binary-incompatible changes to gnomemm 1?
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 17:15:52 +0100 (CET)
On 28 Jan 2003, Murray Cumming wrote:
> gnome-- hasn't built with my autotools for a while. Could you try to
> make a tarball for me? And while you're at it, you might make it depend
> on gnome-libs 1.4.1.6 which is the one that broke the procbar API.
1.4.1.6? Now that's a weird version number :)
I've put a tarball up at http://cactus.rulez.org/files/ can you check it
please and then release it?
--
.--= ULLA! =---------------------. `We are not here to give users what
\ http://cactus.rulez.org \ they want' -- RMS, at GUADEC 2001
`---= cactus cactus rulez org =---'
Soha ne egyél nagyobb valamit, mint a fejed.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]