Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Registration Failed:Not Acceptable
- From: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- To: GnomeMeeting mailing list <gnomemeeting-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Registration Failed:Not Acceptable
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 19:13:15 +0200
Le jeudi 22 juin 2006 à 12:07 -0400, Allan a écrit :
> On Thursday 22 June 2006 09:21, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > Le mercredi 21 juin 2006 à 17:32 -0400, Allan a écrit :
> > > On Wednesday 21 June 2006 13:41, Damien Sandras wrote:
> > > > > > NOT ACCEPTABLE on ekiga.net = Behind NAT and not configured (no
> > > > > > STUN). The druid probably activates STUN.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you. That fixed it. Upgrading seemed to have changed the NAT
> > > > > traversal setting on my system. The strange thing now is that STUN
> > > > > works. In earlier versions I had to use IP translation.
> > > >
> > > > I fixed something related to STUN where it was failing before (while
> > > > doing calls, registering should have always worked).
> > >
> > > Registering did always work until I upgraded. The process of upgrading
> > > somehow changed my NAT Traversal setting to None from IP Translation.
> > > Once you identified the solution everything was back to normal. Must
> > > remember to check settings after the next upgrade.
> > >
> > > I'm working from memory and at my age memory is not always reliable but I
> > > recall that in previous versions setting NAT Traversal to STUN did not
> > > work on my system. The problem lies I believe in the nature of my
> > > router/modem (with its built-in firewall) which the druid reports as
> > > having a symmetric firewall. I previously had to set NAT traversal to IP
> > > forwarding to make Ekiga work. Now the druid will accept STUN but
> > > despite all that the druid still reports a symmetric not a cone firewall.
> > > This is NOT a problem as Ekiga does work, just an observation.
> >
> > Ah, so the druid reports "Symmetric NAT" and the druid accepts STUN to
> > be set?
> >
> > If so, it is a new bug...
>
> Just to make sure there is no confusion, I DO port forward and the druid
> continues to identify a symmetric firewall but the druid accepts STUN.
>
Symmetric firewall or symmetric NAT, they are different...
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o-
//\ Ekiga Softphone: http://www.ekiga.org/
v_/_ FOSDEM 2006 : http://www.fosdem.org/
SIP Phone : sip:dsandras ekiga net
sip:600000 ekiga net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]