Le jeudi 14 octobre 2004 à 14:25 +0930, Malcolm Caldwell a écrit : > We certainly don't want that to happen. > > Is there any harm in leaving the 10 lines that enable h.263 if it is > available? Of note the code is surrounded by #ifdefs - IMHO the lines > themselves can't be a problem, as they don't cause any of the h.263 code > to be included in the binary. It would just allow h.263 to work if it > were already in openh323. > > Of course that does not help the fact that openh323 still has to be > compiled and distributed with h.263. > I think that if OpenH323 is compiled with H.263 as plugin, I can dynamically add it using the capabilities table without using the #ifdefs. But we will see. Ultimately openh323 will have video codecs plugin support, that would solve the problem. -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=