Congratulations for the work. The main reason I insisted some times with NM<->GM problems is because there is no GM for windows and unfortunatly most ppl use Windows :P Great work. But .. one ideia, since GM is now entering windows system, and becoming a more wide option, is there any possibility for the development of the same freedom in video Codecs as in sound ? I'm wondering if will it be possible in the future to have a develop different Codec's a use them. Just a thought. On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 22:14, Damien Sandras wrote: > Hello to all, > > Many of you have complained through the years that GnomeMeeting had too > many dependancies. > > We have worked on this (we had a GNOME Disabled version for long), but > we had no equivalent to GConf, thus preventing a Windows port to be > functionnal. > > Julien Puydt has worked on that problem and has coded a pure GLIB > backend to store the configuration when GConf is not used. I have > integrated the patch, and reworked the --disable-gnome option. > > What does that mean? > > - GnomeMeeting will stay GnomeMeeting, integrated to the GNOME desktop. > - It is possible to compile GnomeMeeting Lite, using --disable-gnome and > --disable-sdl, it will produce a binary that only depends on GTK+, > OpenH323, PWLib and usual libraries. > - GnomeMeeting Lite will be available for Windows (if our port is > successful, but it seems to be so far) > > > What are the differences between GnomeMeeting Lite (--disable-gnome > --disable-sdl) and GnomeMeeting : > - GM Lite is not integrated to the GNOME desktop and doesn't support the > session > - it has no configuration druid (we are working on this) > - it doesn't support fullscreen > - it doesn't support passing URL as arguments > - it has no about box (you won't see who has coded ;) ) > - it has no PC-To-Phone configuration window > > > I'm not sure we will provide packages for GnomeMeeting Lite, but you > will always be able to compile it from sources if you need it. The main > purpose of that version is to make a Windows port easier. I'm not > convinced it makes much sense on Linux, but I know some of you think it > does. -- Filipe Veloza <fmvel rnl ist utl pt> PGP ( ID:0xB8ED711C SERVER:pgp.mit.edu )
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part