Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Gnomemeeting Release Party ;-)

[Conrad Beckert <conrad_b yahoo com>]

>> No, no way unfortunately.... And even if it was
corrected, your video and audio would be dropped by
their NAT machine, because if the private address
comes embedded, it means that their NAT doesn't
support H.323.<<

Well - the gatekeeper protokoll says:
ACF|192.168.1.33:1720|2249_endp|12777|conrad_b:h323_ID|pappus:h323_ID|false;
ACF|10.0.0.10:1720|2250_endp|12777|Conrad
Beckert:h323_ID=conrad_b:h323_ID|pappus
[::ffff:10.0.0.10]:h323_ID|true;
CDR|9|78 1e cf 11 85 ef 18 10 9f 67 00 e0 98 9a 88
8a|108|Thu, 04 Mar 2004 20:40:22 +0100|Thu, 04 Mar
2004 20:42:10
+0100|192.168.1.33:1720|2249_endp|10.0.0.10:1720|2250_endp|conrad_b:h323_ID|pappus:h323_ID|beccon;

The conference worked. Obviously the gatekeeper knows,
that the 192.168.1.33 is a NATted one and replaces it
by the source address of the packet instead (which is
of course the address of the NAT router) Obviously the
gatekeeper waits for the calling machine to send its
RTP and returns its packets with the same port
numbers. (so they get through because the respective
bindings exist)

I'm not sure if I'm right with my observations but
recieving calls from natted endpoints worked only
after I installed the gatekeeper.

Conrad




	
		
Mit schönen Grüßen von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de