Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] TOS

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

Le mer 03/09/2003 à 10:42, Kilian Krause a écrit :
> Hi Damien,
> 
> > I think that at least 99% are ignoring it. That is why I never added it.
> 
> sorry, but you underestimate the power and future importance of QoS..

I don't underestimate the future, I was trying to estimate the present
;)


> If there shall be a one-network-infrastructure one day, there's no way
> to live without.
> Regarding the discussions on the LARTC ml shows there's even quite some
> public interest in QoS. Current implementations may show that most
> classifying is done through port-numbers or even Layer-7, but there's
> still a good chance that VoIP traffic in general will profit from a
> minimum-latency TOS. (i doubt "max. thruput" makes much sense with
> just-in-time live data)
> 
> IMHO the discussion should be if to set min. latency (and maybe max.
> reliability) by default. 
> 
> For those who need a good table to get a brief idea of what TOS is,
> please check:
> http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.qdisc.classless.html
-- 
 _	Damien Sandras
(o-	GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\	FOSDEM 2004:  http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_	H.323 phone:  callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com