Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] packet loss
- From: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- To: gnomemeeting-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] packet loss
- Date: 13 Mar 2003 01:08:36 +0100
Le mer 12/03/2003 à 22:42, John Cambiotis a écrit :
>
> I am sorry but I lost the part with the late packets:
>
> >You are sending packets to the remote user, those packets are queued in
> >the jitter buffer (for example a jitter buffer could contain the packets
> >for 200ms of voice), when the jitter buffer is full (the 200ms are
> >elapsed) it plays the voice back. If one of the packets sent 300ms ago
> >arrives after 300ms when the jitter buffer is of 200ms, then it comes
> >too late to be played.
>
> Do the packets carry some kind of timestamp or sequence number?
Yes.
> Does the receiver simply discard packets because the jitter buffer is full?
No, it discards them because they don't arrive early enough. Newer
packets have been played.
> Is there any synchronization with the video frames?
>
No, but it is "real-time".
> Thank you once more
> JC
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online
> http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
>
> _______________________________________________
> GnomeMeeting-list mailing list
> GnomeMeeting-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
echo
'12245692587856285105409351sn[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb[q]salbxq'|dc
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]