Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Esound in GnomeMeeting
- From: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- To: gnomemeeting-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-list] Re: Esound in GnomeMeeting
- Date: 20 Feb 2003 11:42:11 +0100
Le jeu 20/02/2003 à 11:36, Volker Braun a écrit :
> Hi Damien,
Hi Volker,
Have you tried to use direct OSS and Esound and compared?
The difference is quite audible, and the CPU suffers a bit more when
Esound is used...
PS: you can contact me offline.
>
> There is no mathematical reason why resampling 44kHz->8kHz should be any
> worse than directly sampling at 8kHz (But of course there are
> speed/quality tradeoffs in the implementation). There should not be any
> big quality difference between esd and pure oss now, but then I have not
> used a filter length that would satisfy audiophiles.
>
> If you think that you can clearly distinguish between esd and oss then I
> would like to figure out why. It should either be a bug in your sound
> card or esd. To eliminate the first, try to record at 44kHz and resample
> with sox's polyphase algorithm. If you can tell the difference between
Shouldn't I record at 8kHz and resample at 44kHz instead?
> this and oss recording at 8kHz then there is a problem with the sound
> card. If not then it is a bug in esd and i'll fix it (sending samples
> with description would help).
>
> I have not yet contacted the esd maintainer because this is not a simple
> patch, its in big parts a rewrite of the esd spaghetti code and I'd like
> to fix some more bugs.
>
> Best regards,
> Volker
>
> _______________________________________________
> GnomeMeeting-list mailing list
> GnomeMeeting-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-list
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\ FOSDEM 2003: http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_ H.323 phone: callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]