[GnomeMeeting-list] [FWD] Bug#129052: gnomemeeting: FAQ is misleading w.r.t. NAT
- From: Sander Smeenk <ssmeenk freshdot net>
- To: gnomemeeting-list gnome org
- Subject: [GnomeMeeting-list] [FWD] Bug#129052: gnomemeeting: FAQ is misleading w.r.t. NAT
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 19:41:27 +0100
Hey,
Damien? Can you 'fix' the FAQ with this information? Thanks.
Regards,
Sander.
----- Forwarded message from "Steve M. Robbins" <steven robbins videotron ca> -----
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2002 12:58:52 -0500
From: Steve M. Robbins <steven robbins videotron ca>
To: submit bugs debian org
Subject: Bug#129052: gnomemeeting: FAQ is misleading w.r.t. NAT
Reply-To: Steve M. Robbins <steven robbins videotron ca>,
129052 bugs debian org
Package: gnomemeeting
Version: 0.12.2-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
I believe that there is a mistake in question #8 of the FAQ.
8. Does it work behind a NAT ?
Yes, but people will be unable to call you.
The appropriate module can be found on :
http://www.coritel.it/coritel/ip/sofia/nat/nat2/nat2.htm
However this module is not very stable and only works with the 2.2 kernel.
Another solution would be to install the OpenH323Proxy
(http://openh323proxy.sourceforge.net/) or the OpenMCU (http://www.openh323.org/code.html)
and install it on your firewall.
In my experience it doesn't work at all behind a NAT without
the ip_masq_portfw module, which tallies with the NetMeeting HOWTO
document
http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/NetMeeting-HOWTO/using.html#NATROUTING
I used the netmeeting.masq.sourceforge.net code and it works beautifully.
Without the module, the symptom is that I can talk to the other party but
I hear no incoming audio.
I hope you will correct the FAQ and send this note upstream as well.
Regards,
-Steve
--
| Do you want it in one line? Does it have to fit in 80 columns? ~L.Wall
| 1024D/08CEC94D - 34B3 3314 B146 E13C 70C8 9BDB D463 7E41 08CE C94D
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]