Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] NAT traversal / [RFC] secondary STUN server option

[Peter Robinson <pbrobinson gmail com>]

> I don't think having a secondary STUN server in the prefs is the right
> solution. That sounds like a workaround to me.

Two servers both pointed to by stun.ekiga.net or something like that
(DNS round robin), so we can try one, then try the other if the first
fails. That way its in code and you don't need to worry about users
getting confused.

Peter