Hi Damien, Am Mo, den 21.06.2004 schrieb Damien Sandras um 9:26: > I will ask to Cédric, perhaps that the snapshots should be moved to > Gnomemeeting.org, they have more bandwidth, everything is saved, and > that would be more logical for users. hehe, we already have 3 mirrors for the snapshots (4 when counting my home box which does do a debian mirror too). So it's barely possible to "loose" a snapshot. I just ran out of space on the buildd server so i had to cut down the archive to now 10 days. If bandwidth is a problem, we should point more users to the join mirror, which is supposed to have plenty. About the unstable releases, i somewhat doubt it's a good idea as the overhead is quite exhaustive (unless we do invent a flag in the buildd to have the new releases just "drop right out of it"). This idea was already foreseen in the original planning of the buildd, but has not yet been realized (and even then it requires quite some effort to make this work seamlessly). So if there's a point in "unstable" releases, then let's make them "testing" releases with a little more preparation and move the whole 1.2 schedule forward a bit.. Somewhat i tend to agree with Snark that our snapshots are already pretty stable, so we could just copy out certain packages when we're satisfied with them to a "recommended unstable beta".. This could oppose the "bleeding edge cvs - may be broken" of daily snapshots. -- Best regards, Kilian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil