Le dimanche 29 août 2004 à 21:52 -0600, Srinivasa Ragavan a écrit :
> Sorry damien, marco Pesenti is being awarded this bounty. Im going to
> progress this by today,
> -Srini.
>
Hello Srini, are you sure you are not confusing that bounty with another
one?
As a reminder the bounty contains this :
"The desktop environment's central addressbook should be able to store
information about how to reach a given person via videoconferencing.
This involves two tasks:
* Allow GnomeMeeting to store the location information for a user
in the appropriate Evolution addressbook entry.
I got no patch from Marco regarding this, I have coded it myself.
"The gnomemeeting code will need to be modified to use the Evolution
addressbook as its addressbook store."
I got no patch from Marco regarding this either, I have coded it myself
and it was pretty long.
"This may also require extending GnomeMeeting to enable
videoconferences to be programmatically started, and to create an
interface that will"
Same here.
I don't think it is really fair from Novell. I spent months integrating
GnomeMeeting with Evolution Data Server, for a bounty dedicated to
GnomeMeeting, and the person awarded for that bounty did not code
anything for GnomeMeeting.
Moreover the amount of code required to add the field to evolution is
largely inferior to the amount of code required to add one field to
Evolution Data Server.
I'm not running after the money for that bounty. I'm not against the
fact that you tell me that GnomeMeeting is not worth it, but it is a
shame that another person receives the money for a GnomeMeeting bounty
without having contributed to GnomeMeeting.
Sincerely Yours,
--
_ Damien Sandras
(o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
//\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org
v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=