Hi, After some reflexion, I think too. But I don't know yet how to present that to the user so that the GUI is intuitive :-/ Probably renaming "Output Device" in "Sound Events" in "Ring Tone Output device" is enough? I could also add a drop-down menu with all possible devices for each of the sound events, but that sounds like overkill for the users. Le lun, 26/07/2004 à 20:17 +0200, Kilian Krause a écrit : > Hi Damien, > > > However, the dial and busy tones are played through the device chosen > > for the sound events. I realize that people would perhaps like to have > > the busy and dial tones played in the headset and only the ring signal > > on incoming calls played through the speakers, but I think that being > > able to play each of the sound events through a different device can be > > overkill and confusing for average users. > > well, i think too that for something you initiate, the output should be > on the in-call-audio-device whereas a call you don't control (i.e. the > incoming event) should be played to the external speakers. Having the > outgoing ringtone on the speakers sounds like an unneeded accustic air > pollution to me. ;) > > _______________________________________________ > Gnomemeeting-devel-list mailing list > Gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnomemeeting-devel-list -- _ Damien Sandras (o- GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/ //\ FOSDEM : http://www.fosdem.org v_/_ H.323 phone : callto:ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=