Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re:[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list]Re:[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list]possible PAT
- From: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
- To: gnomemeeting-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re:[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list]Re:[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] Re: [GnomeMeeting-devel-list]possible PAT
- Date: 14 Sep 2003 22:53:32 +0200
Le dim 14/09/2003 à 08:39, julien puydt laposte net a écrit :
> You didn't really explain why you think it would be a bad idea
> to have the single buffer case handle everything?
>
Because all apps are doing it, and also performance-wise.
I wouldn't take the risk to break everything by using only one buffer
just for qce-ga.
--
Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
