[GnomeMeeting-devel-list] [Fwd: RE: RFC problem or question...]

[Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>]

-----Message suivi-----
> From: Orit Levin <orit radvision com>


> To: Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>


> Subject: RE: RFC problem or question...


> Date: 03 Jun 2003 10:15:04 -0400


> 
> Hi!
> In this case the user must insert h323:@seconix.com:1740. If
> h323:seconix.com:1743 is inserted the seconix.com will be interpreted as an
> H.323 alias and not as a domain name...
> 
> It is one of the compromises that we made in the ITU-T.
> 
> Orit.
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Damien Sandras [mailto:dsandras seconix com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 9:22 AM
> > To: orit radvision com
> > Subject: RFC problem or question...
> > 
> > Hello Orit,
> > 
> > I'm the author of a small H.323 program for Linux (and soon for
> > windows). That program is Open Source and is thus free.
> > 
> > The next release will comply to rfc3508 but we have some doubt because
> > the RFC says that :
> > -> address     =   user / "@" hostport / user "@" hostport
> > 
> > So what should happen if the user types: 'h323:seconix.com:1743", should
> > it take the "seconix.com:1743" as an user, or should it call
> > seconix.com, port 1740.
> > 
> > The problem is that if the user wants to call host seconix.com with port
> > 1743, his intuition will lead him to call "h323:seconix.com:1743" and
> > not "h323:@seconix.com:1740" like the RFC seems to indicate it.
> > 
> > Do you have any comments about this?
> > 
> > Thanks a lot,
> > --
> >  _	Damien Sandras
> > (o-	GnomeMeeting: http://www.gnomemeeting.org/
> > //\	FOSDEM 2003:  http://www.fosdem.org
> > v_/_	H.323 phone:  callto://ils.seconix.com/dsandras seconix com
-- 
Damien Sandras <dsandras seconix com>