Re: Control Center Shell and libslab
- From: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>
- To: Denis Washington <dwashington gmx net>
- Cc: gnomecc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Control Center Shell and libslab
- Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 17:21:35 +0100
On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 15:58 +0100, Denis Washington wrote:
> Thomas Wood wrote:
> > Denis Washington wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> Thomas Wood and I wrote a few patches for the new control center
> >> shell(see
> >> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnomecc-list/2006-November/msg00002.html).
> >> Because 90% of the shell's internals are in libslab, the patches mainly
> >> or only involve changes in that library. My question now is: should we
> >> do this forking of SLAB (i guess at least my patch especially is one
> >> that doesn't fit well with SLED but makes sense in the GNOME context)?
> >> I'd say it would be best if we took the current libslab code and develop
> >> it independently from the Novell SLAB; I see no other way to really
> >> adjust the shell to our needs. But that's just my opinion, comments are
> >> really welcome.
> >>
> >
> > I spoke to Rodrigo and Seb about this briefly on IRC. Rodrigo also
> > suggested forking SLAB, but I would still like some feed back from the
> > current authors about their opinion. Seb is in favour of just going
> > ahead and making changes, since the code is now in GNOME cvs.
> >
> > I've CC'd the authors libslab for their comments. If we don't get any
> > reply, I think we can assume they are not too concerned about what goes
> > on in gnome cvs.
> >
> > With respect to your search entry patch, I think the libsexy changes are
> > nice, but unfortunately libsexy isn't part of the official module set,
> > so we can't definitely depend on it yet. An optional dependency might be
> > possible though.
> >
> > -Thomas
> >
> >
>
> One thing about the libsexy issue: I looked at the Rhythmbox module and
> the developers just put libsexy in there as sub-folder for their search
> entry. Couldn't we do the same for Slab?
>
hmm, we already do that for some libs, and it's not a very good solution
long term, so as others said, just leave it as an optional dependency,
if you want.
--
Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo novell com>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]