> So, do you have a more detailed question for the board? :-) Or is it > "what should we do with local websites?" No, sorry for the misunderstanding. I was talking about the revamp in general. It would be useful to have the board helping us to get to a (re)solution agreed by everybody, on the revamp related issues. The problem here is not of lack of direction, but of multiple directions - not being clear towards which to walk. The webhackers team is not as defined and structured as the average project team and the discussion involves/affects also marketing, documentation, translations, regional groups, GNOME projects, sysadmin, infrastructure and the board itself as representant of the Foundation. Also, it is uncertain the priority level of this revamp in the context of the GNOME project. Some may think it is very urgent, some may think it's actually not that important. If it would be clear how prioritaire is this issue we would discuss much better. If I put "(proposal)" in the header is because maybe you think this is something we still can solve without requesting board intervention. Myself I'm not sure when the board shoulf be requested. I partly feel like a child going to the teacher when there is trouble in the patio. :) -- Quim Gil - http://desdeamericaconamor.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature