Re: Signing off the wgo goals




WHAT IS WGO?

We need to clearly define what is exactly wgo, which parts of the whole
metasite are directly affected of the revamp project and this
discussion. We could mark in bold those parts in the New Structure:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWeb#head-414ca48c4650bea820c5caabf3a9c7bac9fc7878


EDITING WGO

- The right contributors would get the right permissions to edit the
right pages. We need to define "right" here, of course. Editing should
be easy to those with edit permissions.

- A good percentage of dynamic content will come from the subsites via
rss etc. They decide what dynamic information is right for their
subsites and their feeds should be right for us as well.

- A wgo editorial team will edit the own contents of wgo. Editing tasks
shouldn't mess with designing, programming or sysadmin. I.e. an average
editor should not be able to change layout code.


Doubts:

- Claus, what is the problem with databases?

- About events, what about "From guadec.org to events.gnome.org" -
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-web-list/2005-November/msg00026.html

- Olav, although I see feasible standard web solutions for projects, an
integrated user management for web permissions, bugzilla, cvs is a
(cmplex) project by itself, I wouldn't mess it with the current wgo revamp.

-- 
Quim Gil - http://desdeamericaconamor.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]