I'm interested to know whether it would be worthwhile standardising on a set of tidy options for use with the gnome site. This would bring some more consistency to the formating, semantics and error checking. For instance I use a standard config across all my projects like this: tidy-for-file.cfg indent: no wrap: 0 quiet: yes drop-font-tags: yes logical-emphasis: yes numeric-entities: yes output-xhtml: yes show-errors: no char-encoding: utf8 tidy-mark: no Often to make it a little easier to edit the file I use a different config to dsiplay the html in the editor. Typically this will turn on indenting and word wrap which aids readability, like this for example: tidy-for-screen.cfg indent: auto wrap: 80 quiet: yes drop-font-tags: yes logical-emphasis: yes numeric-entities: yes output-xhtml: yes show-errors: no char-encoding: utf8 tidy-mark: no Thoughts? -- Jack
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part