Re: XHTML 1.0 Strict Document Type

[Jeff Waugh <jdub perkypants org>]

<quote who="Alexander Winston">

> I believe that GNOME's Web pages should be held to higher standards than a
> Transitional document type. Already, most of the Web pages that are valid
> XHTML 1.0 Transitional are valid XHTML 1.0 Strict to boot. I am very
> interested in others' thoughts on this topic.

We're aiming for XHTML Strict for everything in CVS (so they can be easily
processed), but will most likely publish as HTML Strict or Transitional on
the site itself (for compatibility).

- Jeff

-- 
linux.conf.au 2004: Adelaide, Australia         http://lca2004.linux.org.au/
 
   "There are men with an appetite for fight and a sense of occasion, and
                  then there is Waugh." - SMH, about Steve