Re: VFS for legacy apps
- From: Hans Petter Jansson <hpj novell com>
- To: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: "gnome-vfs-list gnome org" <gnome-vfs-list gnome org>, "gtk-devel-list gnome org" <gtk-devel-list gnome org>, Damon Chaplin <damon karuna eclipse co uk>
- Subject: Re: VFS for legacy apps
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:54:49 -0600
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 10:45 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 15:11 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> > Which protocols don't require a server address? Which don't require a
> > path relative to the server? If none, will such realistically exist in
> > the future?
> In gvfs currently there is smb-network (i.e. smb:///)
> In gnome-vfs there are things like computer:, network:, cdda:, burn:.
> Another example would be the remote version of file:/// (access files on
> the machine that runs the session bus as discussed earlier in this
> thread).
Good point. So I guess the protocol identifier is the only element that
can be fixed, and the rest must be option=$value.
--
Hans Petter
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]