Re: gvfs status report
- From: Xavier Bestel <xavier bestel free fr>
- To: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- Cc: "gnome-vfs-list gnome org" <gnome-vfs-list gnome org>, "gtk-devel-list gnome org" <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: gvfs status report
- Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:45:08 +0100
Le jeudi 15 février 2007 à 18:57 +0100, Alexander Larsson a écrit :
> > Well, if the 2 apps don't sit on the same computer, what else could you
> > want ?
> > Of course, as an optimization if the 2 apps are "local to each other",
> > they should just use the current behavior.
>
> Actually, its more than a performance issue. What you really want is the
> file reference (i.e. filename), not the file contents. The app recieving
> the filename can do all sorts of things with it, not just read it. e.g.
> it could stat it, it could statfs() it to see what filesystem type it is
> on, it could traverse the filesystem up or down, or it could open the
> file and later save back to the same filename. All of these operations
> would have to be supported, and you need to be able to save the file
> reference persistantly, for say recent-files.
I completely agree the local case should stay as-is, but the current
behavior for remote windows is clearly broken.
> All in all, that seems hard to do via X.
Maybe gvfs needs an X11 plugin ? :)
Xav
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]