Re: bump hal req to 0.5.10? (Was Re: Releases: gvfs 0.1.0, eel & nautlus 2.21.1)

["Elijah Newren" <newren gmail com>]

On Dec 21, 2007 4:18 PM, David Zeuthen <david fubar dk> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2007-12-21 at 12:51 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> > Do we need a newer hal? The one shipped with jhbuild (and official
> > external dep) is 0.5.9.
>
> Right, gvfs uses some new client-side API in libhal that uses a hash
> table so property lookup is O(1) instead of O(n).
>
> Since 0.5.10 was released Oct. 11 2007 and GNOME 2.22 is scheduled for
> sometime in 2008 I think we probably just want to bump the requirement
> to be hal 0.5.10. Most distros shipping 2.20 ship hal 0.5.10; everyone
> else, I think, has it in their development trees.

Sounds good to me.