Re: polling in the inotify code, II



Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 11:49 -0400, John McCutchan wrote:
On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 10:57 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Here is another (untested) patch which attempts to
address the second part of the problem, but only doing
the 8-times a second timeout for delayed event processing
if there are any events to process.
See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348748 for a patch that
short-circuits the need for an event processing timer by not matching
moved_from and moved_to events (doesn't hurt because we don't deliver
them anyways.)

Can we get this commited? It sounds like a major win. (I can't really
review this code, because I don't really know it.)


I will be testing it tonight and will commit it soon.

--
John McCutchan <john johnmccutchan com>




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]