Re: polling in the inotify code, II

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Thu, 2006-07-27 at 11:49 -0400, John McCutchan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-27-07 at 10:57 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > Here is another (untested) patch which attempts to
> > address the second part of the problem, but only doing
> > the 8-times a second timeout for delayed event processing
> > if there are any events to process.
> 
> See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348748 for a patch that
> short-circuits the need for an event processing timer by not matching
> moved_from and moved_to events (doesn't hurt because we don't deliver
> them anyways.)

Can we get this commited? It sounds like a major win. (I can't really
review this code, because I don't really know it.)