Re: Gnome-VFS depending on bonobo



On 16 Mar 2004, Alexander Larsson wrote:

> From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
> Subject: Re: Gnome-VFS depending on bonobo
>
> On Tue, 2004-03-16 at 15:31, Magnus Bergman wrote:
>
> > Fair enough. But just to make sure we understand each other correctly. I
> > don't suggest than any code needs to be changed, just that some features
> > (and their dependencies) could be optional at compile time, and default
> > to build exactly as it does now. But you feel this is to officially
> > support crippled versions to exist, right?
>
> Yes. The existance of such builds (as e.g. packages for some distro)
> would immediately break gnome on the machine it was installed on,
> resulting in strange bug reports.

I think the whole point of the orginal poster was that he wanted to
build a smaller version of gnome-vfs himself for platforms for which
packages didn't exist.

kr,

Chipzz AKA
Jan Van Buggenhout
-- 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 UNIX isn't dead - It just smells funny
                           Chipzz ULYSSIS Org
------------------------------------------------------------------------




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]