Re: catch-all vfs methods

[Alex Graveley <alex ximian com>]

Hi,

On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 06:42, Michael Meeks wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 20:21, Alex Graveley wrote:
> > I think it would be pretty nifty to support catch-all vfs modules, such
> > that if no other module is registered to support a given URI method,
> > modules registered in the conf file as supporting '*' methods, would be
> > given a chance to handle the URI.
> 
> 	Sounds good to me; but presumably it means extra module API and hence
> 2.2 work ? 

Why? vfs_module_init() is already passed in the requested uri method
name, it can just choose to accept it or not.

> Also, presumably 'NULL' is nicer than "*" ?

No :)

-Alex

-- 
 on the canvass of life, incompetence is my paintbrush.