Re: gnome-vfs usage of GConf vs threads

[Alex Graveley <alex ximian com>]

On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 05:51, Michael Meeks wrote:
> 	You have a number of choices ( at least in Sebastian's impl. ) -
> currently I've not looked at implementing the POA changes necessary -
> only getting the client side right. The choices are per POA and
> something like at least:
> 
> 	* handle each request in a new thread - no re-enterancy
> 	* handle each request on a given object in a single thread
> 	* handle each request to the same poa in a different thread
> 	* handle each connection in a different thread.

These are all defined by the CORBA spec, so implementing them would be
good for ORBit on the whole.  Is Sebastian at all interested in trying
to forward-port or rewrite his prior impl?

-Alex

-- 
 on the canvass of life, incompetence is my paintbrush.