Re: Epihpany icon improvement

[Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>]

On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 12:18, Bill Haneman wrote:
> Luca said:
> > Besides mozilla is a 'web suite': following HIG we should have
> > 
> > Internet+
> >         |
> >         +-Mozilla+
> 
> Oh dear, this looks very bad to me; we have "generic" items (or at least
> items that *ought* to be generic) underneath an application-specific
> menu heading!  
> 
> I don't think we should ever make an application-specific submenu under
> applications, that seems like a bad idea.
> 

HIG 25,17 The path of .... ermmhh.. sorry... 

"For application suites that wrap a number of smaller sub-applications
into a single window, such as Evolution or OpenOffice.org, add a menu
item for each sub-application. For example, the mail, calendar, and
tasklist in Evolution should each have their own menu item."

So I was wrong. Reading example 2.5 we should have

Internet+
        |
        +-Mozilla Web Browser
        |
        +-Mozilla Mail
        |
        +-Mozilla Composer
        |

But... who cares? We have ephy!

> - Bill
> 
> >                  +-Web Browser
> >                  |
> >                  |
> >                  +-Mail & News Client
> >                  |
> >                  +-HTML composer
> >                  |
> >                  +-Addressbook
> > 
> > >  But I think our
> > > default configuration should use generic icons for "generic apps" (i.e.
> > > apps that users can choose via the Advanced->Preferred Applications
> > > dialog).
> > > 
> > > - Bill
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-themes-list mailing list
> gnome-themes-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-themes-list
-- 
Think bigger

			My uncle