Re: stock icon structure

[Francis Whittle <fudje phreaker net>]

Image files in 'image'
Perl, Python, etc., in 'code'
html could go in web, code, data, *or* text...

Although it does seem it would be a good idea to separate out the file 
type icons, maybe in another tree called 'mime' or something. Could be 
like:

stock
	(
	text
	...
	web
	)
	mime
		documents (text/plain application/x-gnumeric etc)
		images (image/png image/x-xpixmap etc)
		media (application/x-ogg video/mpeg etc)
		code (text/x-c text/x-python etc)
		 

Or of course we could just follow the 'Document Types' dialogue in that 
respect.

On 2003.06.25 02:55, Alex Combas wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 02:59, Jakub Steiner wrote:
> > Because there's about 1200 OpenOffice icons that are to be moved to
> the
> > gnome-icon-theme we need some structure for the stock icons. Here's
> a
> > suggestion:
> >
> > stock
> >         text (fonts, text alignment...)
> >         image (images, drawings, image effects...)
> >         object (sound, ole, plugin..)
> >         table
> >         chart (charts, graphs...)
> >         data (db...)
> >         navigation (arrows...)
> >         form (widgets...)
> >         code (compilation, debugging...)
> >         web (links, email...)
> >
> > Most of the icons are in 24x24 and 16x16, but some at 32x32 and
> 48x48 as
> > well. If you guys have a better idea how to structure them in g-i-
> t,
> > please speak up.
>
>
> ...But where do we put file types e.g. perl, python, html etc etc? Or
> is
> GNOME planing to move away from those just as its moving away from
> proprietary and application specific file types like .ai .swf .abi etc
> etc...
>
> ~Alex
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-themes-list mailing list
> gnome-themes-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-themes-list

--
Fair dinkum ... Or not, mate.