Re: Let's talk about Bugzilla

[Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>]

NEEDINFO will remove the bug from the queries just like RESOLVED; the
reporter is allowed to re-open RESOLVED bugs as well, but unlike that,
we'll need the bug squad to go through all the NEEDINFO bugs in a
couple of months to close them again — generating more bugmail in the
process.

personally, I'd be okay with NEEDINFO-ing bugs with at least one
comment on them; bugs without comments should just be closed, with the
explicit invite to reopen them if they can be reproduced with a recent
version of GNOME.

ciao,
 Emmanuele.

On 4 August 2014 17:49, Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro gnome org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-08-04 at 16:40 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> > * Bulk close bugs from over two stable releases in the past.
>
> We should mark these bugs NEEDINFO, asking if the bug still exists in
> the latest release, a month or two before they are closed, to avoid
> frustration when valid bug reports might otherwise be closed.
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> gnome-shell-list gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list



-- 
http://www.bassi.io
[ ] ebassi [ gmail com]