Re: Sensors Extension.

[Bob Gustafson <bobgus rcn com>]

I do apologize to the dedicated developers who are trying to make things
better. I certainly do not know who is actually working on the project.

Still a bit paranoid..

On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 17:07 -0700, Luis Villa wrote:
> The project is led by people who have given more than a half-decade
> (and in many cases more than a decade) of their lives to this project.
> This allegation is insulting to them and embarrassing to you, since it
> indicates you have no idea who is actually working on their project.
> You should apologize.
> 
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Bob Gustafson <bobgus rcn com> wrote:
> > Perhaps the Gnome developer group has been infiltrated by folks who are
> > paid to make FOSS look bad?
> >
> > Just paranoid..
> >
> > On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 23:14 +0100, Another Sillyname wrote:
> >> I've just installed Gnome Shell as part of a F15 build, it's the first
> >> time I've played with it and have pretty much ignored the build up as
> >> I prefer to judge these things myself.
> >>
> >> While I'm not totally comfortable yet with the changes I'm willing to
> >> use it for a couple of weeks before making decisions as to whether
> >> I'll stick with it or not.  I've been using F14 with a Compiz desktop
> >> for 2-3 years now.
> >>
> >> I've read assorted arguments in assorted threads regarding human
> >> multitasking capabilities and frankly don't want to get into those
> >> arguments.
> >>
> >> What I don't understand however is the removal of critical/semi
> >> critical indicators from the system without any replacement extensions
> >> being available and if I've read some mailing list threads correctly
> >> no intention to provide replacements.
> >>
> >> Specifically the removal of the hardware monitoring and CPU, Network
> >> etc.... monitoring applets I just do not understand the reasoning
> >> behind.  There is a quantum difference between multi tasking and
> >> process/activity monitoring.  I've many times been working on one of
> >> my machines when a panel indicator has drawn my attention to something
> >> that needed further investigation, sometimes without merit, on a
> >> couple of occasions it's possibly saved machines.
> >>
> >> There's plenty of space on the top bar to allow them, so what's the logic?
> >>
> >> Also is there a way to change to format of the date/time on the top
> >> bar?  I prefer to use a 12 hour clock with an am/pm suffix and no
> >> leading zeros.
> >>
> >> Thanks and I will state I've been impressed with the stability, more
> >> eye candy would be nice though.
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> gnome-shell-list mailing list
> >> gnome-shell-list gnome org
> >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > gnome-shell-list mailing list
> > gnome-shell-list gnome org
> > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
> >