Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- From: Calum Benson <Calum Benson Sun COM>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: Tomas Frydrych <tf o-hand com>, gnome-shell-list gnome org, Neil Roberts <neil linux intel com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org, Ted Gould <ted gould cx>
- Subject: Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 16:55:34 +0100
On 31 Mar 2009, at 16:18, Owen Taylor wrote:
What isn't going to be able to run GNOME Shell is really old
hardware ... if you have a Rage128, GNOME Shell isn't going to happen.
But when we are talking legacy hardware of that age, I think a special
purpose environment makes sense. Whether it's XFCE, or metacity +
gnome-panel, or something else.
I guess the other category here is the current generation of thin
clients... not 'legacy hardware' by any means, they just aren't really
designed for this sort of thing. Yet many people want to (and do) run
current versions of GNOME on Sun Rays, for example, and I'd expect
those numbers to ramp up once OpenSolaris (or some branch of it that
Sun blesses with long-term support) is officially supported by Sun Ray
servers.
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:calum benson sun com OpenSolaris Desktop Team
http://blogs.sun.com/calum +353 1 819 9771
Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
- References:
- Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]