Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Tomas Frydrych <tf o-hand com>
- Cc: Matthew Allum <mallum openedhand com>, gnome-shell-list gnome org, Neil Roberts <neil linux intel com>
- Subject: Re: Metacity, Mutter, GNOME Shell, GNOME-2.28
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 14:22:17 -0400
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 08:58 +0100, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> > - If we import Mutter as it exists now, do we import it literally,
> > or do we convert Metacity using the git => svn import scripts,
> > then rebase Mutter on top of that. I think the quality of the
> > latter is considerably better and would recommend that. (And
> > do we want historical maintenance branches of Metacity in the
> > Mutter repository? I think not.)
>
> Inclined to agree, the rebase would be cleaner; the branches can go, as
> far as I am concerned. Not too thrilled about the prospect of moving
> back to svn though :( .
That is one thing not to worry about; all of GNOME is moving to Git in
two weeks. And if we go with Mutter as a new module separate from
Metacity, we can do that in git.gnome.org at any time.
- Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]