Re: gconfd and multiple machines
- From: seth vidal <skvidal phy duke edu>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gnome-redhat-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: gconfd and multiple machines
- Date: 06 May 2003 18:22:35 -0400
> As I was saying the other day, I don't think "as fast as you can"
> is necessary to get a corrupt database.
>
> The best that writing the files atomically does is give you coherency
> between the keys in a single directory. But that isn't enough:
> it should be easy, for instance, to get
> apps/gnome-terminal/default_profile pointing at a non-existent profile.
At which point we're stuck with:
1. people might corrupt their configs
or
2. or use the orbit connecting over arbitrary tcpip ports b/t machines
that may or may not be able to talk to one another (the afs example)
I'm not sure automatic application notification is worth this.
-sv
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]