Re: eggcups (and libgnomecups) for 2.12

> > Why wouldn't one have a local cupsd?
> Good question. We have local cups daemons. Since the whole asynchronous
> stuff apparently got included to avoid delays when talking with a
> non-responsive remote cups daemon, I assume there are some people
> somewhere that are trying to avoid having a local cups daemon.

No, the async stuff is necessary even for local cupsd, since the local
cupsd can get stuck for noticeable amounts of time while talking to 
remote servers...


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]