Re: [gpm] Support for brightness_in_hardware hal property
- From: Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com>
- To: Tomaž Šolc <tomaz solc tablix org>
- Cc: gnome-power-manager-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [gpm] Support for brightness_in_hardware hal property
- Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:58:44 +0100
On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 18:05 +0200, Tomaž Šolc wrote:
> > Right, I guess the gpm_brightness_xrandr_X commands are not setting
> > hw_changed properly.
>
> I thought widget is displayed when the "brightness-changed" signal is
> emited (like in gpm_brightness_xrandr_may_have_changed() ).
>
> I don't see any function that would emit this signal in
> gpm_brightness_hal_*.
Right, in the xrandr code it's just set to this, so it's never fired
either:
if (FALSE) {
gpm_brightness_xrandr_may_have_changed (brightness);
}
I'm waiting for xrandr to send a "brightness changed" signal, but this
means implementing some code in the X server and I'm waiting for someone
else to fix it :-)
We probably need to hook this up in the HAL code, but HAL doesn't seem
to emit this either for me. This is all a mess -- I guess from 2.25 I'll
only support the xrandr way of doing things and then we'll just have to
fix the drivers.
> Hm. It looks like gpm_brightness_xrandr_output_get_internal() doesn't
> detect that the hardware has changed the brightness.
>
> If I disable gpm_brightness_xrandr_output_set_internal(), then
> output_get always returns the same value, regardless of the actual state
> of the backlight.
>
> So even if you use hal attribute, you can't get the real brightness
> level through xrandr.
Right, so this sounds like a X bug. When we do a query brightness, we
should always check the hardware and not use a cached value. Can you
open a bug against the X driver you are using please?
> There is an added complication that on Eee you can't know which
> brightness button was pressed (up or down - on mine both buttons behave
> as BrightnessDown). I heard that some other Asus laptops also behave
> like this.
Sure, but if we can read the backlight after we get the button press,
then it's trivial to reverse the logic if it's the "other way".
Thanks,
Richard.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]