Re: A unified synchronization architecture?
- From: Eskil Heyn Olsen <deity dbc dk>
- To: "Seth M. Landsman" <seth job cs brandeis edu>
- cc: gnome-pilot-list gnome org, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: A unified synchronization architecture?
- Date: Tue, 7 Dec 1999 19:19:21 +0100 (CET)
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> So here's my thought. I just got a really nifty new cell phone,
> the Qualcomm 860 thin phone, which has three neat features, it does
Isn't that the phone based on a pilot ?
> Well, I'd write this (as soon as I manage to figure out the
> protocol) but why repeat code? Could gnome-pilot be taken apart to the
> level where there is a seperate "device" layer? i.e., use the same basic
> architecture to synchronize with the phone, the pilot, a wince machine,
> etc?
Theoritically yes. All the lowlevel device communication is handled be
pilot-link. So if you wrote a version of pilot link that talked to your
phone, it should be possible.
I'd suggest looking at the pilot-link source, and grepping the gnome-pilot
code (mostly in gnome-pilot/gpilotd/) for pi_* and dlp_* calls.
/dev/eskil
---
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]