Re: next draft of rpm guidelines are here
- From: Kenny Graunke <kenny whitecape org>
- To: gnome-packaging-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: next draft of rpm guidelines are here
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 18:07:07 -0700
On Thursday 03 May 2001 08:33 pm, Chipzz wrote:
> On 3 May 2001, Dean Scott wrote:
> Which brings up a quite painfull point: c++.
> Standard rpm uses RPM_OPT_FLAGS for both c _and_ c++. Which may screw up if
> -fno-exceptions is in the CFLAGS (which is not an uncommon optimization).
> Do the *mm packages actually use exceptions? Never worked with them, so I
> have no idea.
I do not know if *those* use them, but programs which use *mm _do_ use them.
Gabber refused to compile here because I had accidentally set that flag as an
"optimization" - I recommend you do *not* use it, as it tends to screw things
up pretty badly.
] [Thread Prev