Re: GnuCash page on GO site
- From: linas linas org (Linas Vepstas)
- To: Rodrigo Moya <rodrigo gnome-db org>
- Cc: Linas Vepstas <linas linas org>, Josh Sled <jsled-gnomeoffice asynchronous org>, Charles Goodwin <charlie xwt org>, Derek Atkins <warlord MIT EDU>, Gnome Office <gnome-office-list gnome org>, gnucash-devel gnucash org
- Subject: Re: GnuCash page on GO site
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 09:55:49 -0600
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 10:12:08AM +0100, Rodrigo Moya was heard to remark:
> > http://qof.sourceforge.net/ but its only gotten to 0.2
> >
> it does basically waht libgda does. I have no time now to look at it
> with detail, so what's so different on it from libgda?
Well, this is the fundamental political problem, isnt it?
I could say the same about libgda: "it does basically what
qof does. I don't have the time to figure out what libgda
does, so why don't you tell me what it does?"
The point is, I think, that qof already does things that
gnucash needs. Indeed, its a spinoff from gnucash. In fact,
it does some things that libgda does not currently do.
So why should I go out of my way to rip up the guts of
gnucash to replace it with libgda which does less than
what gnucash already does?
We were both invited to have this discussion, I'm trying
to hold up my end of the bargain.
--linas
--
pub 1024D/01045933 2001-02-01 Linas Vepstas (Labas!) <linas linas org>
PGP Key fingerprint = 8305 2521 6000 0B5E 8984 3F54 64A9 9A82 0104 5933
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]